Rijndam

General discussions

Moderator: senjer

User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5677
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

LosAngelesMetro56 wrote:Time consuming...
How do your president candidates typically call it? I might need more staff to do this, so I am creating more J.O.B.S. :lol:
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

Hehe
This is now a dead account.
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5677
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

Also, I am thinking; a series of extra switches at the back, and tracks beyond them to accommodate full train lengths for shunting movements; they don't only take up a lot of space, but also cost a lot of money (land acquisition, buying and laying tracks, and maintenance). And you are probably not going to use all of those tracks on a daily basis. I do not know how much a railway switch costs (let alone a whole series of them to connect all those tracks), but saving those costs might be enough to give a few more people a job at the depot :) ;)
Last edited by Sjoerd on 04 Oct 2016, 14:45, edited 1 time in total.
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

Do they actually cost in the editor?
This is now a dead account.
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5677
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

Haha :D
No, in the editor you can build a million switches if you like, and you are only spending time doing it :D
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

YUS
This is now a dead account.
User avatar
Michiel
Site Admin
Posts: 2471
Joined: 11 Sep 2011, 13:32

Re: Rijndam

Post by Michiel »

Sjoerd wrote:the Utrecht tram system is of the same quality as the Sneltram sections in Rotterdam
Actually there is one big difference: the curve radius. While Rotterdam uses a curves radius similar to heavy rail, Utrecht (and also Los Angeles) has curves that are a lot more tight. While the Rotterdam metro uses switches with a tangent of 1:9, these cities use something like 1:5 on the yards. The Rotterdam metros don't even fit through those, 1:7 is the minimal for them. Hence making a loop in Rotterdam takes a lot more space then it would in these other cities, as the minimal curve radius requires is about four times as large.

Right now the editor only contains 1:9, 1:12 and 1:20 switches, so these tight train yards as in Los Angeles is not even possible right now.
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

Michiel wrote:
Right now the editor only contains 1:9, 1:12 and 1:20 switches, so these tight train yards as in Los Angeles is not even possible right now.
Darn. R.I.P. my Blue Line yard layout.
This is now a dead account.
kinkisharyo
Posts: 114
Joined: 04 Aug 2014, 13:03
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Rijndam

Post by kinkisharyo »

I was thinking if there is actually three new maps are in construction?
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5677
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

kinkisharyo wrote:I was thinking if there is actually three new maps are in construction?
Please put questions that are not strictly Rijndam-related into a separate topic.

Personally, I am only working on the Rijndam network (containing several metro-lines). ;)
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
Post Reply