BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

General discussions

Moderators: senjer, Tom

Did the FAQ help you solve your problem?

Yes
14
58%
No, the methode did not work
4
17%
No, my problem is not mentioned
6
25%
 
Total votes : 24

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby MP 85 » 29 Jan 2017, 15:43

I spotted a pantograph problem to Springstraat :?
Attachments
Pantograph problem.JPG
Defect
Pantograph problem.JPG (193.92 KiB) Viewed 259 times
Image
I am French ;)
Sorry to my bad English langage (Google translate) :idea:
User avatar
MP 85
 
Posts: 76
Joined: 02 Jan 2017, 16:11
Location: France

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby LosAngelesMetro56 » 29 Jan 2017, 15:49

Not again. I was tired of the tunnel wires, now it's going to accure at another location
Los Angeles County Metro
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
 
Posts: 461
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby Michiel » 29 Jan 2017, 15:57

I think the FAQ needs one more entry: do not reply to a random topic with a totally unrelated subject.
User avatar
Michiel
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1038
Joined: 11 Sep 2011, 13:32

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby LosAngelesMetro56 » 16 Feb 2017, 06:43

None of these helped, but I solved my problem on my own. However, I need a link to the Rijndam Update.
Los Angeles County Metro
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
 
Posts: 461
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby Sjoerd » 16 Feb 2017, 08:00

LosAngelesMetro56 wrote:None of these helped, but I solved my problem on my own. However, I need a link to the Rijndam Update.


Read carefully before posting; the link can actually be found on the first page of this topic.
User avatar
Sjoerd
 
Posts: 1452
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Leiden

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby LosAngelesMetro56 » 16 Feb 2017, 08:09

:lol: I already found right after I posted :lol:
Los Angeles County Metro
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
 
Posts: 461
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby MetroSimGermany » 16 Feb 2017, 08:22

I added it to the my first post in the FAQ for more convinience
Support auf Deutsch? Kein Problem! Ich helfe gerne per PM. ;)
Warning: I'm sometimes really funny. Oh, nevermind, that was a joke. Hahaha. 8-) Image
User avatar
MetroSimGermany
 
Posts: 269
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 14:41
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby MetroSimGermany » 18 Feb 2017, 10:06

As it appears that multiple users are having the "file broken/corrupted" issue and a file of a smaller size than the actual file, please first check that the file is coming from sim.bemined.nl.
If it does, try runing a MD5 check on it. The website http://onlinemd5.com/ can be useful for that. I got the following MD5 hash out of a working Beta310.exe installer (105mb):
BEAB67906A237ED97A085ADBC4AD654A


If you still got the problem after multiple redownloads, please provide information about your browser, the time you tried the download, and the speed of your internet connection. Otherwise we can't help solving your problem.


Greets, Mika
Support auf Deutsch? Kein Problem! Ich helfe gerne per PM. ;)
Warning: I'm sometimes really funny. Oh, nevermind, that was a joke. Hahaha. 8-) Image
User avatar
MetroSimGermany
 
Posts: 269
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 14:41
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby ehluv » 25 Feb 2017, 05:05

MetroSimGermany wrote:As it appears that multiple users are having the "file broken/corrupted" issue and a file of a smaller size than the actual file, please first check that the file is coming from sim.bemined.nl.
If it does, try runing a MD5 check on it. The website http://onlinemd5.com/ can be useful for that. I got the following MD5 hash out of a working Beta310.exe installer (105mb):
BEAB67906A237ED97A085ADBC4AD654A


If you still got the problem after multiple redownloads, please provide information about your browser, the time you tried the download, and the speed of your internet connection. Otherwise we can't help solving your problem.


Greets, Mika






my file checksum after doing the test is 7D42DFDD1751892D0232C4E0CC768781
i have downloaded lots of times and it is still corrupted
i have downloaded it from the official website
the file size is 75.4mb on my side what is the file size supposed to be?
my internet speed is 60mbps down and up
ehluv
 
Posts: 6
Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 12:04

Re: BETA 3.10 FAQ (Read before starting new topic!)

Postby ehluv » 25 Feb 2017, 05:09

my file checksum after doing the test is 7D42DFDD1751892D0232C4E0CC768781
i have downloaded lots of times and it is still corrupted
i have downloaded it from the official website
the file size is 75.4mb on my side what is the file size supposed to be?
my internet speed is 60mbps down and up
ehluv
 
Posts: 6
Joined: 03 Feb 2017, 12:04

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nstomjanssen2000 and 2 guests