Rijndam

General discussions

Moderator: senjer

User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5669
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

Alfacinha315 wrote: 26 Jun 2018, 19:38 Thanks.

But wouldn't you remove the scenery in some lines?
Sjoerd wrote: 26 Jun 2018, 19:29 .....and take the parts between the mentioned stations out of the network.
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
Alfacinha315
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16 Sep 2016, 14:20

Re: Rijndam

Post by Alfacinha315 »

I see... So, from Noordvliet the SPR line will end at... Nowhere!

:lol:
Greetings from Lisbon, the capital city of Portugal.
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5669
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

Time to start on creating the light version.

Rijndam Buitenvelden, end of the line :)
Attachments
Rijndam 334 - RBV.jpg
Rijndam 334 - RBV.jpg (381.73 KiB) Viewed 4366 times
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
Trainboy199
Posts: 26
Joined: 22 Dec 2016, 07:52

Re: Rijndam

Post by Trainboy199 »

Maybe is it better to put a sign up instead of a buffer.
Then an inmagined work train can go on the part of the track thats out of service. ;)
SFMUNI
Posts: 73
Joined: 14 Apr 2018, 21:16
Location: San Francisco

Re: Rijndam

Post by SFMUNI »

Trainboy199 wrote: 27 Jun 2018, 13:42 Maybe is it better to put a sign up instead of a buffer.
Then an inmagined work train can go on the part of the track thats out of service. ;)
I like that idea, then that makes it look really like it is out of service for works.
SFMTA does not know how to run a metro system or light rail or streetcar. 8-)
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5669
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

A timetable execution test :)
Attachments
Levelcrossing Rijndam Buitenvelden
Levelcrossing Rijndam Buitenvelden
Rijndam 335.jpg (350.52 KiB) Viewed 4243 times
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

Trainboy199 wrote: 27 Jun 2018, 13:42 Maybe is it better to put a sign up instead of a buffer.
Then an inmagined work train can go on the part of the track thats out of service. ;)
How about a derail?
Attachments
imageproxy.jpeg
imageproxy.jpeg (99.87 KiB) Viewed 4236 times
This is now a dead account.
User avatar
Sjoerd
Posts: 5669
Joined: 26 Dec 2014, 21:14
Location: Alphen aan den Rijn

Re: Rijndam

Post by Sjoerd »

O yes, those things where a great succes in the movie "Unstoppable" :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_WGRSRE5q8
CEO of the Rijndam Electrical Transport company :D
User avatar
LosAngelesMetro56
Posts: 941
Joined: 03 Oct 2015, 19:11
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Rijndam

Post by LosAngelesMetro56 »

Fair point. Although, they are cheaper.
This is now a dead account.
SFMUNI
Posts: 73
Joined: 14 Apr 2018, 21:16
Location: San Francisco

Re: Rijndam

Post by SFMUNI »

@Sjoerd, will the platforms on T2 from Statenpolder two Einsteinstraat and on T1 from Orjanboomstrsat to Garenmarkt be lengthened so two car citylinks can run?
SFMTA does not know how to run a metro system or light rail or streetcar. 8-)
Post Reply