Wikitalk

[Lincoln]

It's different situation however when you mention Hageningen tramline 11 for example. This line has nothing to do with Simvliet as it isn't located in SImvliet and is neither operated by the Simvliet transport company.

This could be solved by instead writing: <tramstop> is stop in Hageningen. It is being served by <lines> and part of the <whatevercompany runs the tram> system.

[Jim2016]

That's something different, in that case you mention the line (Simvliet metroline D), not the map. It's different situation however when you mention Hageningen tramline 11 for example. This line has nothing to do with Simvliet as it isn't located in SImvliet and is neither operated by the Simvliet transport company.

Okay, got it

Also not mentioning maps means not writing things like "It was opened in Simvliet 2020", but instead just writing "The station was opened in 2020". Keep in mind that history has not always been released chronologically and history has been rewritten a few times. In my opinion the wiki should reflect the history as imagined by the creators of the maps, according to the latest version. Meaning there is no '2017' edition of Varenweg for example. Of course the changelog per release can still mention these changes.

What I understand is that we act like the Beta 3.10 Simvliet 2020, for example, never existed.
But should we do the same for previous years? Like in Varenweg's case, shouldn't we say that until 2017, Varenweg had one platform and in 2020 got a second one?

[Michiel]

No, because history can be rewritten, if a new version of Simvliet 2017 were to come out, it will be having 2 tracks. I'm still planning to one day have a new historic version of Simvliet which will then include all changes made since the original version (like Eendrachtsweg being in a tunnel, which it wasn't in older releases).

[Jim2016]

Oh, okay

[Jim2016]

@HOY3 Would you mind stopping adding "H" as a destination code for "Cirkellijn Centrum"? There is no such destination code. Just checked on 2022 v1.3.1 with the default CTD file; the DRIM says "Niet Instappen" and no tracks are set.

[AlistairCowell]

What is Cirkellijn Centrum??

[Sjoerd]

What is Cirkellijn Centrum??

An activity originally made for Rijndam 2016; a line that circles the city center.

[HOY3]

Open ctd file and look, roads AH / BH exists.

However Sjoerd, you forgot to add the texture on the DRIMs (it is not in the list of DRIM codes, nothing corresponds to ID 70 for M1 to M5 ones)

It's in there: change it to ID 92. I sacrificed "M7 Rijndam Airport" (which is only used for a Rijndam 2020 activity) to supply "Cirkellijn Centrum"

Destination codes are destination codes when they make path to somewhere.

And this is the case.
For your case, the station and those switches doesn’t exist in 2016 so a path isn’t set.

Try to spawn a train in RCS3 and assign it a number with mission BH: you’ll see

[Jim2016]

It’s not functional therefore. Rather, a left over which happens to work at some stations.

Try to spawn a train in RCS3 and assign it a number with mission BH: you’ll see

Which means the train won’t manage to do the full circle and it’ll stop at GGH

And to make it show up in the DRIM you have to change it yourself. In that case we have thousands if not millions of destination codes combinations.

[HOY3]

The most important is the path you said. Even if you have a "bug of texture". Consider it like a texture bug.
If Sjoerd do an update of the ctd file, Wich consists litterally to enter two letters in the file, you'll consider it?